Growth

The global military Artificial Intelligence (AI) market is projected to surge from USD 9.2 billion in 2023 to USD 38.8 billion by 2028, a staggering 33.3% Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR).¹ Within this explosive growth, the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) is not merely a participant; it is aggressively positioning itself to lead this technological transformation. With the DoD requesting $1.8 billion for AI programs in FY2025 ² on top of substantial cloud and platform contracts, the message is unequivocal: AI is no longer a futuristic concept but a present-day strategic necessity for national defense. This monumental shift demands a closer look at the drivers, implications, and opportunities arising from the DoD’s deepening commitment to AI.

The AI Imperative: Why the DoD is Doubling Down on Artificial Intelligence Now

The current strategic landscape is compelling the DoD to accelerate its adoption of AI. Warfare itself is undergoing a fundamental metamorphosis, with AI leveraging machine learning, robotics, natural language processing, and computer vision to reshape military strategies and operations.³ This evolution is critical in the face of pacing threats, particularly the need to sustain and strengthen deterrence against strategic competitors like China. Beijing has openly communicated its intentions to field AI for military advantage and champions the concept of “intelligentized warfare,” compelling the U.S. to maintain its technological superiority.⁴

Recent global conflicts, notably the war in Ukraine, have served as a real-world “AI war lab,” demonstrating the pivotal roles that civilian tech firms and AI tools can play in modern military operations.⁵ These lessons have undoubtedly spurred the DoD’s own innovation drive, reinforcing the understanding that defense innovation and artificial intelligence are now inextricably linked to maintaining a technological edge and ensuring national security.⁶

A core driver behind this AI investment surge is the pursuit of “decision advantage”.⁴ This concept, repeatedly emphasized in the DoD’s Data, Analytics, and AI Adoption Strategy, signifies a critical shift. The focus is not merely on developing more advanced weaponry, but on enabling faster, higher-quality decision-making, augmented by AI, across the entire spectrum of defense operations. This implies a move from platform-centric warfare to information-centric operations, where the ability to process information and act decisively becomes the paramount factor for success. Officials have consistently highlighted AI’s role in enhancing commanders’ decision-making capabilities ⁶, underscoring that AI is intended to empower human choices from the “boardroom to the battlefield”.⁴

Furthermore, while advanced AI-driven weapon systems often capture public attention, a significant portion of the DoD’s AI investment is directed towards enterprise-wide transformation. This includes modernizing logistics, streamlining business operations, enhancing intelligence analysis, and even improving processes like security background investigations.⁴ This broader application indicates a foundational modernization effort aimed at optimizing the entire defense enterprise, not just its combat arms. The goal is a more efficient, agile, and data-driven military institution capable of meeting contemporary and future challenges.

Decoding the Dollars: A Look at Recent Department of Defense AI Contracts and Spending Trends

The DoD’s commitment to AI is clearly reflected in its recent contracting activities and budget allocations. Several high-value awards and initiatives underscore the scale and direction of this investment.

A notable example is Palantir’s Maven Smart System, an AI-powered software suite for intelligence analysis. The contract ceiling for Maven was recently boosted by $795 million, bringing its total potential value to nearly $1.3 billion through 2029.⁸ This increase was attributed to “growing demand” from military users across multiple combatant commands and even NATO, signaling that Maven is transitioning from an experimental project to a scaled, operational capability critical for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) tasks.⁸

Foundational to deploying such AI applications is robust cloud infrastructure. The DoD awarded $9 billion under the Joint Warfighting Cloud Capability (JWCC) to Google, Oracle, Microsoft, and Amazon.² These contracts are essential for hosting the vast datasets and computational workloads required by advanced AI systems, highlighting that widespread AI deployment in defense hinges on modern cloud capabilities.

The Chief Digital and AI Office (CDAO) is spearheading several strategic procurement initiatives. The AI Talent 2.0 Blanket Ordering Agreement (BOA), under which companies like Devis have been awarded spots, is designed to provide the DoD with rapid access to top-tier AI capabilities, data science expertise, and digital transformation services.¹⁰ This vehicle aims to bridge the talent gap and accelerate the integration of AI across the department. Looking ahead, the CDAO is preparing for the Advancing Artificial Intelligence Multiple Award Contract (AAMAC), a colossal $15 billion, 10-year Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract.¹¹ With an estimated 50-70 awards anticipated, AAMAC will cover 29 focus areas, including AI, data analytics, and IT infrastructure, signaling a comprehensive approach to acquiring AI solutions and services at scale.

Analyzing budget figures further illuminates the DoD’s AI trajectory. The department requested $1.8 billion specifically for AI programs for fiscal year 2025.² Broader federal AI contract obligations totaled $5.6 billion from FY 2022 to FY 2024, with defense spending constituting the lion’s share at 72%, or $4.0 billion.⁷ While overall federal AI spending saw a 6% growth in this period, defense AI spending increased by 1%. In contrast, civilian agencies experienced a more rapid 20% growth in AI spending, potentially indicating a maturation of initial DoD AI investments and a period of catch-up by other federal entities.⁷ The peak in federal AI spending in FY 2023 was notably driven by DoD task orders, including those under the Joint Artificial Intelligence Center’s (JAIC) Warfighter Decision Support programs.⁷

Encouragingly for industry diversification, small businesses secured 35% of total federal AI obligations and saw their awards increase by 34% from FY 2022 to FY 2024.⁷ This suggests a concerted effort to broaden the defense industrial base and tap into innovation from smaller, agile companies. The CDAO’s assumption of AI oversight also appears to have streamlined funding, with its direct appropriations jumping significantly from $10.3 million in FY22 to $320.4 million in FY23.¹²

These spending patterns and contract structures reveal a sophisticated investment strategy. The DoD is concurrently making massive investments in AI platforms like Maven and the JWCC cloud environment, while also establishing mechanisms like AI Talent 2.0 and AAMAC to acquire specialized AI talent and services.² This dual approach acknowledges that cutting-edge technology alone is insufficient; it requires skilled human expertise to develop, deploy, integrate, and manage it effectively.

Furthermore, the shift from direct appropriations for AI research towards large, multi-award contract vehicles and an increasing reliance on private-sector contracts points to a maturation in how the DoD procures AI.¹¹ The department is moving beyond bespoke R&D projects toward acquiring enterprise-scale, operational capabilities, integrating AI more deeply into the standard defense acquisition system. The very structure of these multi-vendor awards, such as the JWCC involving four major cloud providers and the planned 50-70 awards under AAMAC, inherently promotes interoperability and data portability. This directly addresses concerns about vendor lock-in, a point of emphasis for legislative oversight bodies ², by fostering a competitive environment where solutions are more likely to be designed for compatibility.

Strategic Alignment: How AI Modernization in National Defense Bolsters U.S. Security Priorities

The DoD’s substantial investments in AI are not arbitrary; they are deeply intertwined with overarching U.S. national security priorities. The 2023 DoD Data, Analytics, and AI Adoption Strategy explicitly articulates its purpose: to enable “enduring decision advantage” and directly support the National Defense Strategy (NDS) by strengthening deterrence against strategic competitors, particularly China.⁴ AI investments are targeted to address key operational challenges identified in the 2022 NDS, fill critical capability gaps, and enhance the warfighting capabilities of the Joint Force.⁴ Thus, AI modernization in national defense is viewed as essential for countering coercive measures by adversaries and deploying continuous technological advancements to meet complex security challenges.⁴

Maintaining a technological edge is paramount. As adversaries aggressively pursue AI capabilities ⁵, the DoD aims to leverage AI to preserve U.S. military superiority.⁶ This objective is reinforced by executive-level directives, such as President Trump’s 2025 Executive Order on “Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence,” which emphasizes streamlining AI development to maintain strategic advantages over competitors.⁶ Bianca Herlory, the Joint Staff AI lead, has affirmed that AI is “increasingly central to DOD efforts toward digital modernization,” specifically to enhance commanders’ decision-making and responsiveness as global threats evolve.⁶ Practically, AI enhances operational efficiency across numerous domains, including warfare systems, target recognition, ISR, cybersecurity, and logistics.³ For instance, as far back as 2018, 44% of organizations were already utilizing AI for security intrusion detection, a figure indicative of AI’s growing importance in defense.³

The strategic impetus behind AI adoption extends to the concept of deterrence. The DoD’s AI strategy is not solely focused on prevailing in future conflicts but also on deterring them by signaling advanced capabilities and the capacity to rapidly adapt.⁴ The emphasis on “decision advantage” aims to enable the U.S. to outthink and outmaneuver potential adversaries, thereby discouraging aggression and preventing escalation. The demonstration of superior AI-driven decision-making and operational capabilities can itself act as a powerful deterrent, akin to other strategic military assets.

Moreover, the DoD’s AI modernization efforts appear to be part of a broader, “whole-of-nation” approach. The alignment with presidential executive orders ⁶ and the consistent emphasis on partnerships with private industry and academia ⁴ suggest that these initiatives are a key component of a comprehensive national strategy. This strategy aims to ensure American leadership in AI, a critical general-purpose technology with implications far beyond purely military applications. The integration with broader U.S. government policy and the innovation ecosystem underscores a recognition that maintaining an edge in AI requires a collaborative national endeavor.

The Innovation Ecosystem: Partnerships, Pipelines, and Progress in Defense Innovation and Artificial Intelligence

The DoD is actively cultivating a vibrant innovation ecosystem to accelerate the adoption of AI. This involves fostering diverse partnerships, establishing robust ethical safeguards, and creating dedicated pipelines for technological advancement.

Positive examples of these efforts abound:

Cross-industry partnerships are a cornerstone of this strategy. The Army Futures Command (AFC), for instance, collaborates with academic institutions like Carnegie Mellon University and actively engages with both traditional defense contractors and innovative startups.14 This mirrors the long-standing success of DARPA, which has a rich history of funding groundbreaking research at top universities and transitioning technologies like GPS, the internet, and operational AI into the defense sector.15 The CDAO and the Army are also increasing their capacity by working closely with commercial teams and leveraging commercial tools.4 A prime example of this is the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU), which recently awarded contracts to commercial AI providers such as CORAS, GovSignals, and Pryzm Dynamics for its Enterprise Workflow and Reporting Platform (eWARP) project, aimed at streamlining budget and project management using AI.16

Central to these innovation efforts is a commitment to ethical AI in defense systems. The DoD has established a comprehensive framework through documents like the DoD Data, Analytics, and AI Adoption Strategy (2023) ⁴ and the Responsible AI (RAI) Strategy and Implementation Pathway (2022).¹³ This framework is built upon five core RAI Tenets:

• Responsible: Systems must serve their intended purposes without causing unintended harm.
• Equitable: Systems must function without bias across diverse populations and scenarios.
• Traceable: The operation and decision-making processes of AI systems must be transparent.
• Reliable: Systems must perform consistently and dependably under varying conditions.
• Governable: Mechanisms for appropriate human intervention and control must be designed into systems. These tenets are not mere suggestions; they are now integral evaluation criteria in DoD procurement decisions.¹³ To support implementation, the DoD released the Responsible AI Toolkit in 2023, offering practical resources, templates, and assessment guides for contractors.¹³ This includes an emphasis on comprehensive documentation, rigorous bias detection and mitigation strategies, regular security assessments against standards like NIST SP 800-53, and robust governance structures.¹³

The increasing formalization of these RAI tenets signifies a critical shift: contractors who proactively embed these principles into their solutions and demonstrate robust compliance will gain a significant competitive advantage. This transforms ethical considerations from a secondary concern into a primary determinant for contract awards, making “Responsible AI” a key differentiator in the marketplace.

Table: DoD’s Responsible AI (RAI) Tenets at a Glance

Several innovation pipelines are being established or enhanced to bring emerging military technologies to the forefront. The CDAO is spearheading initiatives like AI Talent 2.0 ¹⁰ and the $15 billion AAMAC ¹¹ to streamline AI acquisition and access vital expertise. The CDAO itself is undergoing restructuring to better accelerate AI adoption.⁸ The DIU continues to focus on rapidly integrating cutting-edge commercial technologies, as seen with the eWARP project ¹⁶ and its work helping the Navy acquire new AI capabilities for maritime operations centers.⁸ Initiatives like the Army Software Factory aim to build critical tech skills within the uniformed workforce.¹⁴ Furthermore, long-standing programs like the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs remain key entry points for startups, with the potential for Phase III awards to lead to sole-source government contracts.¹⁸ Programs such as AFWERX’s Strategic Funding Increase (STRATFI) and Tactical Funding Increase (TACFI), Accelerate the Procurement and Fielding of Innovative Technologies (APFIT), and the Rapid Defense Experimentation Reserve (RDER) are specifically designed to help bridge the “valley of death” for innovative technologies, facilitating their transition from prototype to operational use.¹⁸

This multifaceted approach to innovation reveals a “dual-track” model. The DoD is simultaneously pursuing large-scale, enterprise-level contracts with established industry players (e.g., JWCC, Maven extensions) while also utilizing agile, rapid prototyping and talent acquisition mechanisms targeted at startups and commercial innovators (e.g., DIU solicitations, SBIR program, AI Talent 2.0 BOA). This reflects a comprehensive strategy to leverage both the existing industrial capacity of large defense contractors and the disruptive potential of new, often smaller, technology firms.

Navigating the Labyrinth: Risks and Governance in Emerging Military Technologies

The rapid integration of AI into military capabilities, while promising significant advantages, also introduces a complex array of risks and governance challenges that demand careful navigation. Addressing ethical AI in defense systems is paramount.

One of the most prominent concerns revolves around Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS). The prospect of “killer robots” raises profound ethical questions, particularly regarding the meaningfulness of human control (MHC) as AI systems operate at speeds and complexities that may outpace human cognition.⁵ Recognizing these concerns, the DoD has revised its autonomous weapons policy to incorporate stricter review processes and ensure safe and ethical deployment.³

Bias and equity are also critical considerations. AI systems must be designed to function without unfair bias, as mandated by the DoD’s RAI tenets.¹³ There are inherent risks of AI systems misidentifying individuals or perpetuating unintended biases, especially if their training data is not sufficiently diverse or rigorously vetted.⁴ Accountability presents another challenge: assigning responsibility when an AI system causes unintended harm or makes critical errors becomes increasingly difficult, especially in complex human-machine teams where decision-making is distributed.⁵ This potential for an “accountability gap” in hybrid warfare scenarios, where AI is deeply integrated into command and control or even autonomous functions, poses a significant ethical and legal hurdle that current governance frameworks are struggling to adequately address.⁵

Governance challenges are multifaceted. A significant issue is the “perilous regulatory void” stemming from the absence of a comprehensive global governance framework for military AI.⁵ This lack of international consensus heightens risks to international peace and security. Existing frameworks, such as the EU’s AI Act, often explicitly exclude military AI from their scope, citing national security prerogatives.⁵ The dual-use nature of AI further complicates regulation; distinguishing between civilian and military applications of AI technologies is inherently difficult.⁵ This was starkly illustrated when OpenAI, a leading AI research firm, revised its usage guidelines to lift previous restrictions on military and weapons development applications.⁵ This “mission creep,” where AI systems initially designed for specific civilian tasks can be repurposed to serve military objectives, is an inherent risk of general-purpose AI technologies.⁵

The sheer speed of AI development often outpaces the ability of legal and ethical frameworks to adapt, creating a persistent lag.⁵ This is compounded by the potential for unintended consequences. The complexity of advanced AI systems can lead to compounding errors with potentially devastating outcomes.⁵ Moreover, adversarial attacks could theoretically alter an AI system’s behavior—for example, by manipulating its source code to misidentify targets—with catastrophic results.⁵

Within the U.S., legislative and oversight bodies are actively engaging with these issues. Senator Elizabeth Warren, for example, has raised significant concerns regarding Department of Defense AI contracts, advocating for increased competition, robust protection of government data, prudent use of taxpayer funds, and measures to avoid vendor lock-in.² Her proposed “Protecting AI and Cloud Competition in Defense Act of 2025” aligns with broader White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance on promoting competition, although national security systems are often subject to specific exemptions from such general guidelines.² This highlights a tension: while national security systems may be exempt from certain federal AI guidelines applicable to non-defense sectors, the DoD is simultaneously striving to implement its own stringent ethical AI principles.¹³ This necessitates a careful balancing act to ensure rigorous ethical standards and effective oversight within a domain that often operates with less transparency due to legitimate security requirements. The DoD aims to navigate this by internalizing ethical governance and has committed to establishing transparent governance and compliance processes to address potential privacy and civil liberties challenges.⁴

The Contractor & Innovator Playbook: Capitalizing on the DoD’s AI Push

The DoD’s accelerated drive towards AI modernization presents substantial opportunities for contractors and innovators across the technology spectrum. The global military AI market is on a steep upward trajectory, with projections indicating spending could exceed $30 billion by 2028 ¹⁹, and some estimates suggesting the overall market could reach $38.8 billion by 2028 ¹ or $23.9 billion by 2029.²⁰ This burgeoning market signals a vast and expanding landscape for companies offering AI-related products and services.

The demand spans a wide array of AI solutions, from foundational data management and analytics capabilities to sophisticated machine learning models for ISR, cybersecurity, logistics, autonomous systems, and decision support tools.³ There is a clear focus on identifying and integrating emerging military technologies into both existing platforms and future defense systems.

Opportunities abound for various players:

• Startups: The DoD has created several pathways specifically for smaller, agile companies. SBIR/STTR programs remain crucial entry points for securing R&D funding and establishing credibility, with successful Phase III projects offering the potential for sole-source contracts.¹⁸ CDAO and DIU initiatives, such as the AI Talent 2.0 BOA ¹⁰, the AAMAC with its dedicated small business pools ¹¹, and DIU’s commercial solution solicitations ¹⁶, are explicitly designed to engage non-traditional defense contractors. Startups offering niche capabilities, like Danti’s AI-powered knowledge engine for intelligence users, demonstrate the potential for specialized solutions to find traction.²¹ Cooperative Research & Development Agreements (CRADAs) can also offer funding and invaluable access to end-user requirements, although intellectual property considerations must be carefully navigated.¹⁸
• Researchers (Academia): Academic institutions play a vital role in foundational research. Opportunities exist for partnerships with DoD research labs and entities like DARPA and Army Futures Command (which collaborates with institutions like Carnegie Mellon).¹⁴ Research focus areas include not only core AI, quantum computing, nanotechnology, and cybersecurity ¹⁵ but also the critical ethical and societal implications of military AI.
• Established Players (Primes): Large defense contractors will continue to play a key role in major systems integration projects, such as cloud deployments and significant platform upgrades. They can also leverage their existing contract vehicles and program-of-record relationships. Furthermore, there are increasing opportunities for primes to team with startups, bringing specialized innovation into larger programs.¹⁸

Navigating the DoD’s compliance landscape, particularly its Responsible AI requirements, is critical for all contractors. Alignment with the five DoD RAI Tenets is mandatory.¹³ This necessitates comprehensive documentation of data sources and model development, robust bias detection and mitigation processes, regular security assessments against standards like NIST SP 800-53, and strong internal governance structures.¹³ The CDAO’s RAI Toolkit offers valuable resources to aid in these efforts.¹³ Proactive compliance is not merely a regulatory hurdle but a competitive advantage; conversely, non-compliance can lead to significant post-award issues and remediation costs.¹³ It is advisable for contractors to designate AI compliance leads within their organizations and conduct thorough gap assessments against DoD requirements.¹³

While the “valley of death”—the perilous transition from R&D to scaled procurement—remains a challenge, the DoD is actively working to build new bridges. Programs like STRATFI/TACFI, APFIT, RDER ¹⁸, and large IDIQ contracts such as AAMAC ¹¹ are specifically designed to create more viable pathways for innovative solutions to reach operational deployment.

A crucial, often underestimated, prerequisite for successful AI contracting is “data readiness.” The DoD’s AI Adoption Strategy places significant emphasis on foundational data management as its first strategic goal.⁴ This implies that contractors offering AI solutions must also demonstrate how their systems can effectively integrate with, consume, and potentially improve the DoD’s complex data ecosystems. AI solutions that are “data-aware” and capable of operating within and enhancing these environments will be strongly favored, as quality data is positioned as the bedrock of the DoD’s AI Hierarchy of Needs.⁴

Table: Key DoD AI Contract Vehicles and Opportunities

The Bigger Picture: Broader Trends in Defense Tech and AI Policy

The DoD’s AI initiatives are unfolding within a dynamic global context characterized by intense competition and rapidly evolving policies. Major world powers, notably the United States and China, are engaged in a high-stakes competition for dominance in military AI technology.⁵ China’s explicit pursuit of “intelligentized warfare” underscores this rivalry.⁵ The global military AI market is experiencing explosive growth, projected to exceed $30 billion by 2028 ¹⁹, with some forecasts placing it near $38.8 billion by that year.¹ North America currently holds the largest market share at 45%.¹ Europe is also significantly ramping up its investment in defense AI through initiatives like AI4DEF, ARCHYTAS, and STORE, aiming for greater technological autonomy and interoperability.¹⁹

AI policies are in a state of continuous evolution. The DoD’s 2023 Data, Analytics, and AI Adoption Strategy, which supersedes earlier strategies, reflects this adaptive approach.⁴ Guidance from the OMB aims to streamline AI adoption across federal agencies, signaling a shift from cautious risk aversion towards “accelerated, safe adoption” ⁶, although, as noted, national security systems often operate under specific exemptions.² The Trump administration’s Executive Order on AI leadership sought to remove barriers hindering AI development.⁶ Despite these national efforts, the debate over effective governance for military AI continues, both domestically and on the international stage, where a comprehensive framework remains elusive.⁵ This rapid pace of AI development consistently outstrips the ability of policymakers and international bodies to create effective, timely governance and ethical frameworks. This “policy lag” is a significant source of risk and uncertainty in the military AI domain.⁵

Reflecting the growing importance of AI, positions such as Chief AI Officer (CAIO) are rapidly becoming indispensable within defense and national security organizations as AI technology becomes more deeply integrated into operations.⁶

This global landscape presents a complex dynamic regarding the proliferation of military AI. While the development of AI was once predominantly the domain of a few major powers, the increasing accessibility of AI tools and talent, coupled with the inherent dual-use nature of the technology, could lead to a wider dissemination of military AI capabilities.³ However, the substantial cost and complexity of developing truly cutting-edge, military-grade AI systems might still result in a concentration of the most advanced capabilities among nations with significant resources and established technological infrastructure.¹ This creates a tension between the potential for broader “democratization” of AI and the continued “concentration” of elite AI power.

Shaping the Future: How Stakeholders Can Engage and Contribute

The future of AI in defense will be shaped by the collective actions and contributions of diverse stakeholders. Proactive engagement and collaboration are essential for navigating the opportunities and challenges ahead.

• For Startups: Success in the DoD AI market requires a clear focus on specific DoD problem sets and the ability to demonstrate tangible value propositions.¹⁸ Leveraging pathways like SBIR/STTR, DIU solicitations, and CDAO contracting vehicles (including those with small business set-asides like AAMAC) is crucial.¹¹ Teaming with prime contractors can offer valuable market access and insights into larger programs.¹⁸ Critically, startups must proactively build Responsible AI principles into their solutions from the outset and be prepared to meet stringent compliance requirements, including cybersecurity mandates like CMMC and DFARS clauses.¹³
• For Researchers (Academia): The academic community has a vital role in advancing foundational AI research and exploring its ethical and societal implications. Seeking partnerships with DoD research laboratories and organizations like DARPA and Army Futures Command can facilitate impactful contributions.¹⁴ Developing robust methodologies for testing, validation, and verification (TV&V) of AI systems is another critical area for academic research.
• For Government Entities (DoD and others): Continued efforts to foster an agile and adaptive acquisition process for AI are essential.⁴ Investing in digital talent management—hiring, training, and retaining skilled AI professionals within the government workforce—is paramount.⁴ Promoting inter-agency collaboration and strengthening public-private partnerships will accelerate innovation.⁴ Furthermore, government entities should champion efforts towards establishing international norms and governance frameworks for military AI to mitigate risks and promote stability.⁵

Beyond simply funding and acquiring AI, DoD entities like the CDAO and DIU are increasingly adopting the role of “ecosystem orchestrators.” They are actively working to connect disparate players—startups, prime contractors, academic institutions, and military end-users—and to streamline pathways for innovation.⁴ This represents a more strategic and proactive engagement than traditional procurement models.

Given the rapid and relentless evolution of AI technology, a mindset of continuous learning and adaptation is imperative for all stakeholders. Static strategies, skillsets, or technological approaches will quickly become obsolete.⁴ Success in the defense AI domain will require ongoing education, flexibility, and a willingness to iterate and pivot as the technology and the global threat landscape continue to change.

Conclusion: The Future of Defense is Intelligent – What’s Your Role?

The Department of Defense’s substantial and growing investment in artificial intelligence signals a fundamental transformation in military capabilities and national security strategy. This is not a fleeting trend but a strategic imperative, driven by an evolving global threat landscape and the pursuit of enduring decision advantage. The infusion of billions of dollars through new and innovative contracting mechanisms is unlocking significant opportunities for a diverse range of technology developers, researchers, and service providers. AI modernization in national defense is poised to reshape everything from battlefield operations to back-office efficiencies.

However, this technological surge is accompanied by profound challenges. Navigating the complexities of ethical AI in defense systems, addressing intricate governance issues, and mitigating potential risks are crucial for responsible and effective AI adoption. Collaboration across government, industry, and academia, coupled with proactive engagement from all stakeholders, will be paramount in shaping a future where AI enhances security while upholding democratic values.

Despite the sophisticated algorithms and autonomous potential of AI, the enduring human element remains central. Ultimately, critical decisions, ethical judgments, and strategic direction must reside with human operators and leaders.³ The goal of AI in defense is to augment human capability, enhance situational awareness, and improve the speed and quality of decision-making—not to replace human accountability or moral reasoning.

The era of AI-powered defense is here. The trajectory of defense innovation and artificial intelligence will be determined by how effectively we harness its potential while managing its complexities.

What’s your take on the DoD’s AI strategy and the path forward for these emerging military technologies? Share your insights in the comments below or join the conversation on LinkedIn.

Found this analysis insightful? Share it with your network to foster discussion on these critical developments.

Visualizing AI in Defense: Suggested Infographics

• Timeline of Key DoD AI Initiatives and Policy Milestones: Illustrating the progression from the 2018 AI Strategy, the 2022 Responsible AI Pathway, and the 2023 AI Adoption Strategy, to major contract awards like JWCC, Maven extensions, and the AAMAC announcement.
• Potential Data Sources: ²
• Map/Chart: The DoD AI Ecosystem – Key Players and Contract Flows: A visual representation of the relationships between entities like the CDAO, DIU, military services, major contractors, and the types of AI capabilities being procured.
• Potential Data Sources: ⁸
• Infographic: AI Use-Cases in Modern Defense: An overview of AI applications in areas such as ISR (e.g., Project Maven), cybersecurity, logistics and predictive maintenance, autonomous systems (e.g., drone swarms), decision support tools, and advanced training simulations.
• Potential Data Sources: ³
• Chart: Projected Growth of the Military AI Market (Global and U.S. Focus): Displaying market size forecasts (e.g., to 2028 or 2030) and highlighting key growth drivers for both the global and U.S. defense AI sectors.
• Potential Data Sources: ¹

Works cited

1. Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Military Market by Offering (Software, Hardware, Services), Technology (Machine Learning, Natural Language Processing), Platform (Airborne, Land, Space), Application, Installation Type, Region – Forecast to 2028, accessed May 29, 2025, https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5306656/artificial-intelligence-ai-in-military-market
2. Warren Questions Hegseth – U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren, accessed May 29, 2025, https://www.warren.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/warren-questions-hegseth-on-dod-ai-contracting-pushes-for-competition-protection-of-government-data
3. Artificial Intelligence in Military Statistics and Facts (2025), accessed May 29, 2025, https://scoop.market.us/artificial-intelligence-in-military-statistics/
4. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE – Data, Analytics, and Artificial … – DAU, accessed May 29, 2025, https://www.dau.edu/sites/default/files/webform/documents/26761/DOD_DATA_ANALYTICS_AI_ADOPTION_STRATEGY,%20June%202023.pdf
5. Governing Military AI Amid a Geopolitical Minefield | Carnegie …, accessed May 29, 2025, https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/07/governing-military-ai-amid-a-geopolitical-minefield
6. Defense Officials Outline AI’s Strategic Role in National Security …, accessed May 29, 2025, https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/article/4165279/defense-officials-outline-ais-strategic-role-in-national-security/
7. Federal Artificial Intelligence Spending Trends, FY 2022-2024 …, accessed May 29, 2025, https://iq.govwin.com/neo/marketAnalysis/view/Federal-Artificial-Intelligence-Spending-Trends-FY-2022-2024/8401?researchTypeId=1&researchMarket=
8. ‘Growing demand’ sparks DOD to raise Palantir’s Maven contract to more than $1B, accessed May 29, 2025, https://defensescoop.com/2025/05/23/dod-palantir-maven-smart-system-contract-increase/
9. Contracts for May 21, 2025 – Department of Defense, accessed May 29, 2025, https://www.defense.gov/News/Contracts/Contract/Article/4194643/
10. Devis Awarded Strategic AI Contract with Department of Defense, accessed May 29, 2025, https://www.devis.com/blog/devis-awarded-strategic-ai-contract-with-department-of-defense
11. Winning the $15B AAMAC DoD Artificial Intelligence Contract | OCI, accessed May 29, 2025, https://www.ociwins.com/government-proposal-consultants/winning-the-15b-aamac-dod-artificial-intelligence-contract/
12. Budget Trends and the Future of AI in U.S. Defense, accessed May 29, 2025, https://dsm.forecastinternational.com/2025/03/11/budget-trends-and-the-future-of-ai-in-u-s-defense/
13. DoD AI Compliance: Key Requirements and Strategic Implementation, accessed May 29, 2025, https://natlawreview.com/article/dod-ai-compliance-guidance-government-contractors
14. AI and software in defense: Shaping tomorrow’s Army | Insight Partners, accessed May 29, 2025, https://www.insightpartners.com/ideas/ai-and-software-in-defense-shaping-tomorrows-army/
15. The Role of Academia as a Driving Force for Defense Tech and Security Innovation – iHLS, accessed May 29, 2025, https://i-hls.com/archives/128795
16. DIU Awards 3 Contracts for AI-Powered Financial & Project Management Tools, accessed May 29, 2025, https://executivegov.com/2025/03/diu-3-contracts-ai-financial-project-management-tools/
17. DIU Awards Three Contracts To Streamline DIU’s Budget Execution and Project Management – Defense Innovation Unit, accessed May 29, 2025, https://www.diu.mil/latest/diu-awards-three-contracts-to-streamline-dius-project-management
18. DoD Contracting for Startups 101 | Andreessen Horowitz, accessed May 29, 2025, https://a16z.com/dod-contracting-for-startups-101/
19. The Future of Defense: How AI Is Transforming the Industry – EuroDev, accessed May 29, 2025, https://www.eurodev.com/blog/defense-industry-ai-transformation
20. Artificial Intelligence In Military Global Market Opportunities And Strategies To 2034, accessed May 29, 2025, https://www.thebusinessresearchcompany.com/report/artificial-intelligence-in-military-market
21. AI startup wants to give troops the power of career intel professionals | DefenseScoop, accessed May 29, 2025, https://defensescoop.com/2025/04/02/danti-ai-startup-knowledge-engine-military-intelligence/

https://sheridantech.io